posted 08-21-2007 12:28 AM
stat:Your missing a good time. Too bad you're not here.
Ted:
quote:
If an examinee calls it a Dick....it's a Dick. Not a penis, not a weenie, not a hot dog.
No. If he calls it a dick, its still a penis. He just calls it a dick.
But you are really talking about how to communicate at the level of the client. That seems fine, and perhaps necessary at times.
Keep in mind that there are different ways of thinking about this - esp with children. One way tells us to use the subject's native vocabulary. Another tells us that some people will do better once we've asked them what they call it. Then if they are awkward or anxious about saying those words in front of some stoic professional - in pressed shirt, looking over his glasses and down his nose, propped up with feet crossed comfortably, legal pad in one hand and pen in the other... saying "now tell me your most embarassing secret..." - (as if that stuff works to build rapport), they communicate more easily and authentically when we give them the proper words. Like talking to the hotel empleado about my missing keys... Si. Y perdido mi llaves. Others can't do that, and we stick to their vocab.
As to more expressive cursing during a test. I don't I'd get away with it. Besides, I'm obnoxious enough without adding more curse words. I cursed more as a therapist. That doesn't mean we don't drop some strategically timed BS-bombs during a posttest on rare occasions.
Simply by being peristent and methodical, I had two subjects abort during the pretest during the past month, and two more pretest confessions to sexual assault allegations.
There are jurisdictional variations too. You once mentioned running a "new" kind of test. If someone did that in Colorado, they'd probably be subject to demanding phone call, if not a professional complaint.
Like it or not, regulation is good for the profession. It does limit the degree of creativity that can be exercised at times, but it seems to prevent more long term problems than it solves. Some regulations say things like "treated with respect and dignity." Cursing at clients during a pre-test is asking for trouble.
Last time I even made a joke with a client I was called by a PO - the guy was taken of GPS after several months, and I said something about he ought to be careful with all that freedom because he had more opportunity to get into trouble - to me this is just setting up the idea that I'm going to ask a few more questions about your whereabouts and activities.
Mostly, the problem with cursing is like stylish glasses from the 80s, once the moment is passed, it doesn't impress people later on videotape.
The real goal is to make 'em sick to their stomach without having to curse. OK, that's not really the goal.
The real goal is to build a particular kind of rapport with the examinee. The rapport is based on credibility, expertise, authority, some expectation you are there to help, and the idea that you are capable of understanding the examinee and his worldview. How you build that is up to you. The endgame of extracting a confession can occur when the examinee is willing to look responsibly at himself and let you hold his ego for a little bit (sorry for the psychodynamic slant, but I can't think of a better way to state that right now) - when they examinee is ready to endorse the idea of telling you the truth to help himself, when the idea of admitting the truth to you can become an ego-syntonic or tollerable activity, often based on the belief that you understand his thoughts feelings, behavior, and motivation.
I'm not any kind of fan of canned Schtick, most adult sex offenders are adept manipulators who smell that stuff early. They see it. We see it. Picture the 20th or so polygraph on the same offender, and we say "you're obviously not a very good liar. we're going to have to trouble telling whether or not your telling the truth today..." You'd have to defib me back to life if I had to do that every day.
If cursing a little gets you real with a client (even that sounds like some parroted tripe from an EST workshop), if it gets beyond the typical character armor that stands between professionals and clients, then OK. For now.
You might get away with cursing, based on your personality, authenticity, judicious use /non-use, or the balancing effect of the extra-cursing rapport you have built. Other people might not get away with it. One of the best measuring sticks for the viability of a professional skill is - could you teach others to do it? I think we might just create more problems than we'd solve if we tried that.
r
------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)